Esheria Tanzania Case Law
Sign in
Tanzania Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Tanzania Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Search and filter Tanzania case law

Results update automatically as you type.

Tanzania decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Human rights law kalijo c united republic of tanzania requete n0262017 2023 afchpr 39 7 novembre 2023

kalijo c united republic of tanzania requete n0262017 2023 afchpr 39 7 novembre 2023

Court
TANZLII

The application was declared inadmissible because it was not filed within a reasonable time after exhaustion of domestic remedies. The applicant failed to provide sufficient justification or evidence that his personal circumstances prevented timely filing. The delay of over six years was not reasonable under Article 56(6) of the Charter and Rule 50(2)(f) of the Rules.

Source excerpt

  • Right to non-discrimination
  • Equality before the law
  • Right to fair trial
  • Admissibility of applications
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Reasonable time requirement
Read case analysis
Human rights law haruna c united republic of tanzania requete n 0342016 2023 afchpr 42 7 novembre 2023

haruna c united republic of tanzania requete n 0342016 2023 afchpr 42 7 novembre 2023

Court
TANZLII

The application was not filed within a reasonable time as required by Article 56(6) of the Charter and Rule 50(2)(f) of the Rules. The applicant failed to justify the delay of over six years after the respondent's declaration allowing individual applications. Therefore, the application is inadmissible.

Source excerpt

  • Right to non-discrimination
  • Equality before the law
  • Right to fair trial
  • Admissibility of applications
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Reasonable time requirement
Read case analysis
Human rights law yusuph c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0362017 2022 afchpr 7 24 mars 2022

yusuph c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0362017 2022 afchpr 7 24 mars 2022

Court
TANZLII

The application was declared inadmissible because it was not filed within a reasonable time after exhaustion of domestic remedies, as required by Article 56(6) of the Charter and Rule 50(2)(f) of the Rules. The applicant failed to provide sufficient justification for the delay of over seven years.

Source excerpt

  • Right to fair trial
  • Right to legal representation
  • Right to equality before the law
  • Admissibility of applications
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Reasonable time requirement
Read case analysis
Human rights law lyambaka c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0102016 2020 afchpr 30 25 septembre 2020

lyambaka c republique unie de tanzanie requete n 0102016 2020 afchpr 30 25 septembre 2020

Court
TANZLII

The application was declared inadmissible because it was not filed within a reasonable time after exhaustion of domestic remedies, as required by Article 56(6) of the Charter and Article 40(6) of the Rules. The applicant failed to justify the delay of nearly six years, and the Court found no exceptional circumstances to excuse the lateness.

Source excerpt

  • Right to fair trial
  • Right to legal assistance
  • Admissibility of applications
  • Exhaustion of domestic remedies
  • Reasonable time requirement
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Tanzania decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.

Source links and collection timestamps are retained alongside the indexed records.