18 Jan 2012
LO HOM CHAU v. THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE
- Citation
- LO HOM CHAU v. THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE
- Court
- Court of Final Appeal
- Case number
- FAMV40/2011
Leave to appeal was refused because Article 26, read in context with other Basic Law provisions (arts 45, 68 and Annexes I and II) and historical legislative development, does not preclude corporate voting in functional constituencies; the applicants' challenge was not reasonably arguable and did not raise a sufficiently important or arguable point to grant leave.