Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Commercial law RCOMAA 00095/2024/CA

APEX BIOTECH LTD v. NDAYOBOTSE N’UNDI

The Court of Appeal upheld an auction sale, holding that APEX BIOTECH LTD had been properly served with auction documents through authorized persons and company emails.

  • Auction law
  • Service of process
  • Corporate procedure
  • Execution of judgment
  • Damages and costs
  • Auction-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA 00036/2022/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MURERAKURE

The appeal was dismissed because the evidence from multiple witnesses, the victim, and documentary proof (medical and birth records) consistently established that Murerakure Jeannette knowingly allowed the sexual exploitation of a minor in her residence. The court found no merit in the appellant's arguments regarding the credibility of witnesses or the minor's age. However, considering mitigating factors such as being a first-time offender and her age, the sentence was reduced from 20 to 15 years' imprisonment.

  • Evidence in criminal cases
  • Accomplice liability
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Sentencing and mitigation
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00538/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs CYUZUZO

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld a 15-year prison term and RWF 5,000,000 fine for drug-related offences, finding no basis for further mitigation.

  • Drug offenses
  • Sentencing
  • Appeals
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offenses
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00508/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs BARIGIZE

The appellant's confession during investigation and prosecution, corroborated by witness testimony, established beyond doubt that he was trafficking cannabis. Retraction at trial did not undermine the probative value of his earlier admissions. The sentence imposed by the High Court was the minimum allowed by law for the offence proven.

  • Drug offences
  • Appeal procedure
  • Evidentiary value of confessions
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00418/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs NIYOYITA

The Court of Appeal held that prior sentencing cases could not be relied on after the law changed, and confirmed the 15-year prison term and RWF 5 million fine.

  • Drug offenses
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Drug-offenses
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00419/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs RUZINDANA

The appellate court held that, following the legislative amendments, the minimum sentence for the offense could not be reduced further, and that prior case law allowing greater reductions was no longer applicable. The partial suspension of the fine was an error, but could not be corrected to the detriment of the appellant since only he appealed.

  • Drug offenses
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00436/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs BIKORIMANA

The minimum sentence for the offense of drug trafficking, as amended by Law No. 59/2023, is 15 years imprisonment and a fine of five million Rwandan francs. Since the law no longer allows for further reduction below this minimum, and the prosecution did not appeal the absence of the fine, the sentence imposed by the High Court stands and cannot be further reduced or altered.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00364/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs HARORIMANA

The Court of Appeal held that prior sentence-reduction precedents under repealed law could not apply, and upheld the 15-year prison term and 5,000,000 Frw fine.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Application of amended law
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00539/2022/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs GIHANA NYAMIHANA

The Court of Appeal held that the evidence did not prove cannabis trafficking, but did prove possession and use. It reduced the conviction and sentence to two years.

  • Drug offences
  • Evidence
  • Appeals
  • Sentencing
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00233/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs CYITUGENEYE

The Court of Appeal held that Cyitugeneye Divine had already received the minimum custodial sentence permitted by law for the offence, considering all mitigating factors. Therefore, no further reduction in imprisonment was warranted. However, the fine was recalculated to one quarter of the statutory minimum, in line with the proportionality principle for fines when the minimum custodial sentence is imposed.

  • Drug offences
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.