The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal appeal against a defilement conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient and credible despite the DNA report.
The Court of Appeal found that the testimonies of the victim and witness were consistent and corroborated by the medical report, which showed physical signs of sexual assault. The defense’s alternative explanations were unsupported and contradicted by the evidence. The court held that the conviction was based on reliable, corroborated evidence and that the sentence imposed was appropriate given the gravity of the offence.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and upheld a 17-year sentence for defilement, relying on the victim’s testimony, witness accounts, and medical evidence.
The Court of Appeal upheld Ngoga Thacien’s conviction for defilement of a minor, holding that the evidence was consistent and not rendered doubtful by alleged conflicts.
The appeal was dismissed because the court found no material defects in the evidence relied upon by the lower courts. The hearsay evidence was corroborated by the medical report, which showed signs consistent with sexual assault. The absence of semen did not undermine the conviction, as the totality of evidence, including the child's testimony and supporting witnesses, was sufficient. The appellant failed to rebut the medical findings or provide a plausible alternative explanation. The conviction and sentence were upheld.
The Court of Appeal upheld Sibomana Aimable’s 15-year sentence for defilement of a minor, holding that the evidence was sufficient and the appeal lacked merit.
The Court of Appeal upheld a defilement conviction, holding that the victim’s account, witness evidence, and medical evidence proved guilt, but reduced the sentence to 15 years.