Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NAHIMANA

Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko Nahimana Jean de Dieu ahamwa n’icuruzwa ry’abantu, ariko rugabanya igihano kiva ku myaka 20 n’ihazabu ya 20.000.000 frw kigera ku myaka 15 n’ihazabu ya 15.000.000 frw.

  • Human trafficking
  • Crossing border without authorization
  • Evidentiary value of statements made during investigation
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Human-trafficking
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Icyaha n’ibihano

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MURANGWABUGABO

Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko igihano cy’imyaka 15 ari cyo gito giteganywa n’itegeko ku bwicanyi, bityo ubujurire bwa Murangwabugabo nta shingiro bufite.

  • Ubwicanyi
  • Kugabanya igihano
  • Impamvu nyoroshyacyaha
  • Igifungo cya burundu
  • Igihano gito giteganywa n’itegeko
  • Kugabanya-igihano
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00227/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v HAKIZIMANA

The Court of Appeal held that, for an offense punishable by life imprisonment, mitigating circumstances cannot reduce imprisonment below 15 years. The appeal was dismissed.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Minimum sentences
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-trafficking
Read case analysis
Criminal law RS/REV/RP 00067/2024/CA

BIENVENU v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The applicant's alleged new evidence (trial transcript) is not new, as he was present and signed it at trial. The grounds do not meet the statutory requirements for review. The application is inadmissible.

  • Sexual offences
  • Review of judgments
  • New evidence
  • Ultra petita
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00877/2024/CA

TURIKUMWE v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The appellant filed his notice of appeal within the statutory 30-day period, as evidenced by the dated and signed document in the file. The delay in transmission by prison authorities cannot be attributed to the appellant. Therefore, the appeal should have been admitted, and the case must be remitted to the High Court for a hearing on the merits.

  • Appeal admissibility
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Procedural time limits
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01071/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v BENDANTUNGUKA

The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Rwandan Francs imposed on Bendantunguka Martin is the statutory minimum for the offense with mitigating circumstances, and cannot be further reduced or suspended under the applicable law.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HARERIMANA

Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko Harerimana Protogène adagabanyirizwa igifungo cya burundu, rusanga uburyo yakoze icyaha bugaragaza ubugome bukabije.

  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Murder
  • Appeal
  • Mitigating-circumstances
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 01115/2024/CA

BIZIMANA P v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The Court of Appeal dismissed Bizimana Papias’s appeal seeking a further sentence reduction for defilement of minors, leaving the 20-year term unchanged.

  • Defilement of minors
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeals process
  • Criminal-law
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. HABIYAKARE

Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko Habiyakare atagabanyirizwa igihano yongeye, rusanga igifungo cy’imyaka 20 cyari gihagije ku cyaha yakoze.

  • Sentence reduction
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Murder
  • Appeal against sentence
  • Victim family forgiveness
  • Sentence-reduction
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00548/2025/CA

MANISHIMWE v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The minimum sentence for sexual assault with mitigating circumstances is 15 years imprisonment; further reduction is not permitted by law. Applicant's mitigating arguments do not justify lowering the sentence below the statutory minimum.

  • Sexual assault
  • Mitigation of sentence
  • Disability rights
  • Procedural fairness
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.