Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law RPAA 00332/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KABARERE

The court found that Kabarere Pascasie intentionally used a deadly weapon (hammer) to strike the victim's head multiple times, and only external intervention prevented death. This established the requisite intent for attempted murder, not mere assault. However, due to the absence of permanent injury, her remorse, and the new legal provisions allowing mitigation, the sentence was reduced to 12 years and 6 months' imprisonment.

  • Attempted murder
  • Assault and battery
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
Read case analysis
Civil law RCAA 00018/2023/CA

IRIBAGIZA v. MUKANYONGA

The court held that Mukanyonga Félicité did not prove she was the sole heir of her late mother and therefore lacked standing and legal capacity to sue for the estate in her own name. Consequently, the lower courts erred in accepting her claim. All related judgments were set aside, and the matter reverted to its prior status.

  • Standing to sue
  • Succession rights
  • Burden of proof in inheritance
  • Jurisdiction of courts
  • Effect of prior judgments
  • Procedural requirements for inheritance claims
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00427/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NSHONGORE

The Court of Appeal upheld Nshongore’s conviction for cannabis possession and sale, but reduced the sentence from life imprisonment to 18 years and a fine.

  • Drug offences
  • Evidentiary assessment
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Criminal-law
  • Drug-offences
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00300/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NSHIMIYIMANA

The conviction was upheld because the combination of the victim's testimony, corroborating witness statements, the accused's own admissions, and the medical report provided sufficient and admissible evidence of defilement. However, the sentence was reduced due to the accused being a first-time offender, aligning with precedent for similar cases.

  • Evidence in criminal trials
  • Defilement of minors
  • Sentencing principles
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA00035/2023/CA-CMB RPAA00036/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. TWAYIGUZUMUGABE

Appellant failed to submit appeal grounds within the statutory 30-day period after judgment copy was uploaded to IECMS; no evidence of timely request or inability to access the copy was provided. Appeal grounds submitted eight months later are inadmissible. Appeal is not admitted.

  • Drug offences
  • Appeal procedure
  • Timeliness of appeal grounds
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00423/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. NIYONZIMA

The Court of Appeal held that Niyonzima Pacifique's grounds of appeal were submitted after the statutory period and did not meet the legal requirements for late submission. Therefore, the appeal grounds were inadmissible and the High Court's judgment, including the 15-year sentence, remained in force.

  • Appeal timelines
  • Sexual offences against minors
  • Procedural compliance
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00367/2023/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BAPFAKURERA

The Court of Appeal found that although Bapfakurera Jean Claude did not fully admit guilt, his young age (19) and first-time offender status justified reducing his sentence from life imprisonment to 15 years, aligning with precedent for similar cases.

  • Defilement
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00308/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NDAYIKENGURUTSE

The court found that the quantity of cannabis (62 boules) and the circumstances, including the presence of buyers and corroborating testimony, established trafficking rather than simple possession. The defense's arguments regarding witness bias and lack of direct evidence of sale were rejected as unsubstantiated. The sentence imposed by the High Court was appropriate and lawful.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Drug possession
  • Evidence assessment
  • Witness credibility
  • Sentencing
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.