Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Source-linked decisions currently available to browse

Criminal law RPAA 00796/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NIYIZURUGERO

The appellate court held that the sentence of 15 years imprisonment and a RWF 5,000,000 fine is the minimum permissible under the law for drug trafficking with mitigating circumstances, and cannot be further reduced or suspended. The appellant's arguments for further reduction or waiver of the fine lack legal basis.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Suspended sentence
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00832/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BAMUREKE

The Court of Appeal held that a life sentence for intentional homicide may be reduced for mitigating circumstances, but not below 15 years.

  • Mitigation of sentence
  • Intentional homicide
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00598/2022/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MBARUSHIMANA

The Court of Appeal varied the sentence only, reducing Mbarushimana Isaac’s punishment for defilement of a child from life imprisonment to 17 years.

  • Defilement of a minor
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Sentence reduction
  • Admission of guilt
  • Burden of proof
  • Criminal-law
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00210/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BIKORIMANA

The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 RWF imposed on Bikorimana Emmanuel alias Rusake is the minimum permitted by the current law for drug trafficking and cannot be further reduced, as the legal provisions and jurisprudence previously allowing further reduction have been repealed or amended.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00209/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BYIRINGIRO

The Court of Appeal held that the sentence imposed by the High Court (15 years imprisonment and RWF 5,100,000 fine) is the minimum allowed by the current statute for drug trafficking, and cannot be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances. Previous jurisprudence allowing greater reductions is no longer applicable due to statutory amendment.

  • Sentencing
  • Drug offences
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Statutory interpretation
Read case analysis
Insurance law RS/INJUST/RC00019/2024/SC

MUKARUHUNGA v. RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY Ltd

Applicant is entitled to economic loss and professional impairment damages based on permanent disability (60%), regardless of continued employment, as statutory and case law require compensation proportional to impairment and its impact on earning capacity and professional advancement.

  • Motor vehicle accident compensation
  • Permanent disability
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Professional impairment
  • Damages calculation
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00832/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. BAMUREKE

The Court of Appeal held that a life sentence for intentional homicide may be reduced for mitigating circumstances, but not below 15 years.

  • Murder
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Sentencing
  • Appeal procedure
  • Criminal-law
  • Mitigating-circumstances
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00832/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. TUYISHIMIRE

The Court of Appeal held that criminal proceedings were extinguished because the accused died after filing the appeal, so it only noted extinction of the action.

  • Extinction of criminal proceedings upon death
  • Appeal
  • Murder
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Extinction-of-proceedings-upon-death
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPAA 00154/2024/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. DUSABE

The law as amended by Article 2 of Law No. 059/2023 sets an absolute minimum sentence for drug trafficking offences punishable by life imprisonment, which cannot be reduced further for mitigating circumstances. The sentence imposed by the High Court is the minimum allowed, and the appeal for further reduction is without merit.

  • Drug trafficking
  • Sentencing
  • Mitigating circumstances
  • Appeal procedure
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 00103/2024/CA

SHALOM METAL SUPPLY LTD v. COPCOM

The Court of Appeal dismissed a second appeal by SHALOM METAL SUPPLY LTD, holding it had no jurisdiction because the alleged conciliation defect did not prove lack of jurisdiction.

  • Jurisdiction of courts
  • Lease agreements
  • Pre-litigation procedures
  • Appeals process
  • Court-of-appeal
  • Jurisdiction
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.